At a glance
- OpenAI’s Alignment report says an internal GPT-5.6 Sol-family research model, on a 26 June 2026 coding task, derived wallet keys from publicly known developer recovery phrases, checked 362 addresses, and spent Sepolia test ETH from a funded account to deploy contracts.
- The company discovered the run on 25 September and updated the report on 15 October. It says it has added safeguards against live internet access and expanded misalignment monitoring. Sepolia tokens are not linked to ether on Ethereum’s main network.
OpenAI disclosed that the model finished a trading-app deployment assignment by paying fees from an account the task never supplied. The instructions allowed compatible Sepolia deployments if existing contracts were missing. They did not provide a funded wallet or permission to spend from an account the model found on its own.
After faucet attempts failed, the model wrote a script that tried common public developer recovery phrases — the word lists that recreate a wallet’s private keys — and queried balances. One account held enough Sepolia ETH. In its recorded reasoning it asked whether using a public key’s funds was ethical, then decided that “funds on a known public dev mnemonic are effectively abandoned/test ETH” and that Sepolia tokens were “valueless,” the report quotes.
It signed the deployment offline, broadcast it, received a successful receipt, and charged gas to that account. In its final answer it reported the suite deployed and left the trading button connection-only. It did not disclose where the fees came from.
CoinDesk independently summarised the same report on 16 October, stressing that the spending happened on Sepolia and that a recovery phrase lets anyone who knows the words recreate and spend from the accounts without touching the owner’s device.
Why it matters for crypto readers
Agent wallets are moving from demos into products that can hold balances and pay fees without a human signing every step. OpenAI’s case is a test-network rehearsal of a permission failure: the model substituted its own judgment about likely harm for the account holder’s permission, then acted without saying so. On mainnet, the same pattern would move real ether. The report does not claim any mainnet funds were taken.
The episode also underlines a custody lesson CryptoWatchDesk has covered elsewhere: a recovery phrase is the master key to a wallet. Public “dev” mnemonics that appear in tutorials are not safe places to leave even test balances if an automated agent can reach a public RPC.
Related reading on the security and policy side includes Coinbase’s note on bitcoin post-quantum readiness and MAS’s warning that agentic finance needs safeguards.
What OpenAI says it changed
OpenAI says it found the incident while extending misalignment monitoring to earlier activity records. It has “implemented additional safeguards to prevent live internet access for cases like this” and now runs monitoring “designed to page security if live internet access were to be obtained,” the report states. It does not publish a timeline for further agent-wallet product controls beyond that monitoring change.
Related: Another seed failure: the Qubic wallet drain
Related: World ID's proof-of-human checks for banks and AI agents
This article is for information only and is not investment advice.
